Skip to main content

STCL Alumni Board of Directors

Peter Ruggero has been elected to the Board of Directors for the South Texas College of Law Alumni Board. Mr. Ruggero will also serve on the Admissions Committee for the Alumni Board.

Net operating losses (NOLs) in bankruptcy

There is a likelihood that a businesses facing bankruptcy has net operating losses (NOLs).  These NOLs might be available to offset taxable income in not only current and future years but also past years to a limited extent. Understanding the value of the NOLs is relevant to a feasibility analysis in confirming a chapter 11 plan.  In addition, under stock sales, the NOLs might be able to be transferred to the purchaser.  You should consult with a tax expert to determine the impact NOLs have on your business and specific goals you seek to accomplish.

Control of bank account can constitute ownership

In de la Pena Stettner v. Smith (In re IFS Financial Corp.), the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that a chapter 7 debtor’s control over certain bank accounts was sufficient to to establish de facto ownership.  Accordingly, the accounts were considered ‘property of the estate.’  A summary of the opinion and copy of opinion can be found here.

Allied Litigant Doctrine in Texas

Lawyers and courts often make reference to the “joint defense privilege,” “common interest rule,” and other similar variations.  These references are to the rule of evidence that, in certain instances, allows parties and their lawyers to assert an attorney client privilege for communications with other parties and lawyers that share a similar, common interest in litigation.  On June 29, 2012, the Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in In re XL Specialty Ins. Co., 373 S.W.3d 46 (Tex. 2012) that discusses the extension of the privilege and articulates a more precise term as being the “allied litigant doctrine.”  The case provides some guidance as to whether a Texas state court applying Texas Rules of Evidence might determine communications fall or not within the allied litigant doctrine.  The opinion can be read here.